Search for: "People v. Swamp"
Results 141 - 160
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
My gig hasn't started yet and I'm already being swamped. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:58 am
Siemer v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 7:27 am
Hamilton v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Vladeck states that advise-and-consent models “depended on the fiction that people were meaningfully giving consent. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
The latest case, Morse v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Wetlands and endangered wood storks that roost at nearby Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary have been the focus of a twisting decade-long legal fight over the permit for the Mirasol project — and it isn’t over yet. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:26 am
Swamp, 84 NY2d 725, 730 [1995], citing People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:56 am
See Clausnitzer v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:56 pm
_See Clausnitzer v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm
(Buck v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 7:10 am
(See U.S. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:20 am
Tornillo and NAACP v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:05 pm
In 2007, many of the restrictions had been struck down by a federal judge in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 10:21 am
As I mentioned earlier this week, the big showdown in the US Supreme Court was Tuesday’s oral argument in FCC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
Policing white people’s behavior was pretty much left up to the women and the Baptist and Methodist clergy. [. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
Barrett v LB Southwark [2008] EWHC 1568 (Comm) was an appeal of a dismissed application for permission to make a s.204 appeal out of time on an intentional homelessness decision upheld at s.202 review. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
One should not expect people to accept arguments just because they are valid. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
You know that, and you don't want people to get hurt while time's a wasting. [read post]
