Search for: "People v. Thomas (1970)" Results 141 - 160 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
(For a recent reevaluation, see Thomas Colby's essay in Northwestern Law Review.)Taken in their own terms, the coercive Article Five exchange between Congress and the states does not establish the constitutional "quality" of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Samantha Barbas, Actual Malice:  Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
O’Connor ran for the seat in her own right in 1970; she won and was re-elected again in 1972. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
I agree with Justice Thomas’ that the Court’s main job is to safeguard the constitutional principles established by We the People at earlier points in our history. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:55 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Ericksen (1970), the Minnesota law regarding the right of publicity was almost completely undeveloped prior to 1970. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
This newest update includes leading cases ranging from the classic 1970s landmark judgment in Klass and others v Germany to the Haščák v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
This undoubted fact is a statistical measure of what the majority of those people in the field believe; it has not [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
This undoubted fact is a statistical measure of what the majority of those people in the field believe; it has not [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:29 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Skeptics of tribal sovereignty see tribes under the thumb of the federal government (conquered is a term I hear a lot) so there cannot be sovereignty at all (Justice Thomas in US v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Steven M. Gursten
In the late 1970s, Michigan’s auto insurance companies railed against No-Fault’s unlimited medical benefits guarantee, insisting the “law be amended to place a ceiling on benefits …” Michigan’s insurance commissioner, Thomas C. [read post]