Search for: "People v. Wells (1985)" Results 141 - 160 of 919
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 537 (1985), but, as a general matter, warrantless searches are unreasonable. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:11 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
A well-being, or safety check, call was made to the local police department a day after the young woman phoned to inform her employer that she wasn’t feeling well. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
I’ve said this before and, until proven wrong, I may well say it again, but neither the immunity nor the casualness of the link are the case. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:20 pm
Drug smugglers cannot assert standing solely on the basis that they hid the drugs well and hoped no one would find them. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 9:50 am by Michael Grossman
If this were 1985, then sure, maybe there’s some legitimacy to the argument that loading dock accidents are something that comes with the territory. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:45 am by Mark S. Humphreys
What is important here is that even companies that a lot of people think well of, such as State Farm, will do a poor job investigating a claim and unjustly deny a claim. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
§ 1985 violations is likely to have no real effect, because § 1985 basically just covers conspiracies to violate civil rights; to intimidate parties, witnesses, or jurors; to intimidate people to affect federal elections; or to injure people based on their advocacy of federal candidates. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 pm by Giles Peaker
I suspect they will be preoccupying quite a few people for a while. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm by NL
ii) If so, was Ground 2 Housing Act 1985 cited as a ground for possession? [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm by NL
ii) If so, was Ground 2 Housing Act 1985 cited as a ground for possession? [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:31 am by John Steele
Superior Court, 705 P.2d 347 (Cal. 1985)(invalidating a contingent fee arrangement in a public nuisance case) with San Francisco v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
Montoya de Hernández, 473 U.S. 531 (1985). [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, the children of people who commit this crime are subject to our jurisdiction as well. [read post]