Search for: "Peoples v. Social Security Administration"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
What is at stake is nothing less than the entire premise of more than a century of immigration policy: Namely, the legitimacy of laws that restrict immigration in order to protect the social, economic, and security interests of the American people. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Barrett dissented, concluding that the Department of Homeland Security’s interpretation was reasonable. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:09 pm
Recently in Cothron v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 12:59 pm
So here, according to an electronic entry in the file, the Social Security Administration Appeals Council apparently did mail notice to a particular claimant and her counsel. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
The American people deserve to know their president will govern in the best interest of the nation and not his self-interest. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
Lee (1992), that approaching people to hand them leaflets is constitutionally protected even in airports (at least as to the areas before the security checkpoint). [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:32 pm
" Boxill v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
In East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:03 am
Social Security Administration (SSA) and is designed for people who had worked their whole life and can no longer work due to a disability. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:34 am
The Social Security Administration (SSA) defines past relevant work as “work that you have done within the past 15 years, that was substantial gainful activity, and that lasted long enough for you to learn to do it. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Evans, in which the Supreme Court struck down a law barring antidiscrimination protection for gay people. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
L. 112-40), which created section 303(a)(11) of the Social Security Act (“SSA”) (42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Biestek applied for Social Security disability benefits. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:43 am
In the Doe v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In other words, if two people are married under New York law, they are married under federal law for Social Security, income and estate tax, and myriad other purposes. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
Although a Social Security regulation has long provided that “[t]he dismissal of a request for Appeals Council review is binding and is not subject to further review,” the Social Security Administration, represented by Assistant to the Solicitor General Michael Huston, agreed with Kimberly that the dismissal was a final decision subject to review but disagreed on one point. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 1:02 pm
“Religious activities should be carried out within the scope stipulated by laws and regulations … and should not interfere with educational, judicial and administrative affairs as well as social life,” Xi said. [read post]
