Search for: "Peters v. Johns" Results 141 - 160 of 1,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
"  New online from the American Journal of Legal History and Oxford Academic: Victorian Railways Commissioners v Coultas: The Untold Story, by Peter Handford. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  It includes Beyond Backlash: Legal History, Polarization, and Roe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Two Guantanamo-related cases set dates for oral argument: Al Janko v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
Callowhill Neighborhood Assoc. v City of Philadelphia Board of Adjustment, 2015 WL 3759405 (PA Commwlth 6/17/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Commonwealth/out/1067CD14_6-17-15.pdf? [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
The major questions doctrine works best as a shorthand label for the traditional tools of statutory interpretation that Justice John Paul Stevens invoked in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
With the announcement that they have agreed to review Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
Despite considering resigning, Professor Peter Tague will remain on the Georgetown Law faculty, Above the Law has exclusively learned. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Peter Coe is a Lecturer in Law at Aston University and a barrister (Door Tenant) at East Anglian Chambers. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 2:56 am
Paraphrasing Justice John Paul Stevens' opinion for the Court in Hamdan v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:53 am by Walter Olson
Ross, Short Circuit on Turner v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:44 am by WSLL
Phillips, Attorney General; John D. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:05 am by WSLL
Michael, Wyoming Attorney General; John D. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:40 am
  The district court also rejected Hobbs' "unique combination" argument because it interpreted the law, as stated in Peters v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 am by James Bickford
Peter DeFazio’s announcement that he intends to investigate the potential impeachment of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]