Search for: "Peterson v. U.s" Results 141 - 160 of 356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2016, 11:58 am by Elina Saxena
The BBC reports that up to $800 million dollars of the Islamic State’s cash have been destroyed by U.S. strikes after U.S. forces stepped up their efforts to target the group’s funding. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am by Yishai Schwartz
In case this wasn’t clear enough, the provision explicitly directed itself toward the Peterson litigation: “The financial assets described in this section are the financial assets that are identified in and the subject of proceedings in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Peterson et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
” The new numbers may provide clues to the U.S. military’s strategy as it considers withdrawing more troops from the region. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am by Amy Howe
 In Bank Markazi v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:43 pm by Howard Wasserman
Peterson, rejecting, 6-2, a challenge to a federal statute under the separation of powers principles of U.S. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm by Andrew Hamm
U.S. ex rel Escobar. 5:13 p.m.: Rory Little previewed next week’s arguments in Dietz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
Peterson, CFLS Introduction: Whether you are an attorney, or "in pro per", the rules of evidence and the California Rules of Court apply to you. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  That is what is essentially at stake in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
Peterson, scheduled for oral argument in mid-January. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am by Lyle Denniston
Peterson — whether Congress violated the constitutional separation of powers by requiring the turnover of U.S. assets of Iran’s central banks to victims of terrorist acts, when that was at issue in a pending court case Puerto Rico v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
The Hill suggests that the decline in defectors could be a sign that policies to prevent people from joining ISIS are working or, alternatively, that U.S. officials are not aware of the people who are still joining. [read post]