Search for: "Phillips v. J" Results 141 - 160 of 771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
He pointed to the fact that Irwin J appeared to have had no difficulty in concluding that the dominant purpose for which the BBC had held financial journalism was that of journalism in BBC v Information Commissioner [2009] EWHC 2348 (see [55] and [57] in particular). [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 12:37 pm
empress_of_sytheria - Mercedes McCombZenferret - Michael Simon, FLInnosed - Bonnie LangHoney - Meghan RadickCookie - Donna Underwood - ALMoseyanme - Christine Keens - Alexandria, VAWinryRockbell - Rebecca Jackson KennedyInterpid Reporter - Jill Phillips - GASummer Breeze - Judy H. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:36 am by Elizabeth Clark
Clark is Associate Director of the International Center for Law and Religion Studies at Brigham Young University’s J. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
In ITV v TV CatchUp [2011] EWHC 2977 (Pat), which was handed down the day of the debate and which the IPKat reported here, Floyd J applied FAPL in the UK to say that the position on the temporary copies exception is acte clair as set out in FAPL, which would seem to contradict NLA v Meltwater. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Laing J cites Lord Sumption’s definition of harassment in 2013: “Harassment is a persistent and deliberate course of unreasonable and oppressive conduct, targeted at another person, which is calculated to and does cause that person alarm, fear or distress: see Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 78 , para 30 (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
The appeal was heard and shall be considered by a five justice panel of Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance and Wilson. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In considering the meaning of “harassment”, Rix LJ drew upon the guidance of the Court of Appeal in Thomas v News Group Newspapers where Lord Phillips defined harassment as: “conduct targeted at an individual which is calculated to produce the consequences described in section 7 and which is oppressive and unreasonable”. [read post]