Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 141 - 160
of 177,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 2:33 pm
Gaynor’s injury as indicated by Plaintiffs’ own expert. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 3:38 pm
In these cases, plaintiffs must show that the employer’s actions were more likely than not based on a prohibited discriminatory criterion. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 10:19 am
The Eighth Circuit revived a plaintiff's hostile work environment claim that the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 8:43 am
The court granted defendant's motion to compel documents withheld as privileged. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:38 am
At trial, plaintiff’s testimony shifted. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
The next day, after plaintiff's daughter suffered a near-fatal seizure, plaintiff told defendant he could not work the following Monday. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:18 am
How can plaintiff lose the case on summary judgment with Syed's admission that he wanted a man for the job? [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:16 am
Jan. 27, 2022), plaintiff’s father and defendant were neighbors. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:33 am
Dionee Searcy of the Wall Street Journal law blog reports about a recent 9th Circuit ruling that held that plaintiff lawyers could deduct as ordinary and necessary expenses the costs they advance for their plaintiff clients: The court “held that attorneys who represent clients in contingency fee cases may treat litigation costs that are paid by [...] [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 10:48 am
Plaintiffs challenged both the qualifications and methodology of defendant’s expert. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:07 am
” The accident caused plaintiff’s airbag to deploy and both drivers were knocked unconscious. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:59 pm
Thus, the court held that the plaintiff’s case was properly dismissed. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 5:53 pm
The plaintiff’s grievances or disappointment in the outcome of her appeal handled by the defendant does not constitute legal malpractice. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:13 am
"[W]hen [plaintiff's] own expert declined to state that the twenty products contained phase change materials that would infringe the [patent-in-suit], [plaintiff's] claims against those products ceased to be colorable, and it was vexatious for [plaintiff] not to withdraw the infringement claims then as to those products. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:25 am
§ 285 because plaintiff's litigation tactics were not unreasonable. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:00 pm
For that reason, the federal courts are the wrong forum for addressing the plaintiffs’ concerns about FDA’s actions. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
However, in this matter, the Plaintiff’s carrier was not necessarily prohibited from providing the Plaintiff with retroactive full tort coverage. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:27 am
"[Plaintiff's] Agreement is nearly identical to the [prior owner's] Agreement. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 8:55 am
Finding that the plaintiff’s theory of what caused his fall was more plausible than the grocery store’s proposed alternative, the court reversed the lower court and allowed the plaintiff’s case to proceed. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:27 am
[Plaintiff's] facts give no indication of when it plans to manufacture or sell the new designs. . . . [read post]
