Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)"
Results 141 - 160
of 69,797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2024, 8:49 am
Ferguson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Garrigan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:20 am
That's what the Supreme Court did in Biden v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:47 am
” The Court ultimately held that GTA raised enough questions to deny defendant’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
” The alert says none of these suits appear to arise from any active director nomination process at the defendant companies, and the potential plaintiffs’ attorney fee seems to be what’s motivating their filing. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:09 pm
The Court dismissed plaintiff’s claims, finding that plaintiff failed to plausibly allege: (1) that any of her sensitive data was transmitted to third parties from defendant’s public facing website; or (2) that pixel tracking software was even used on the patient portal. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm
It also awarded attorney’s fees and costs to the defendants pursuant to a fee-shifting provision in the construction contract. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:41 am
Case Citation: Griner v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Bell v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONF. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:53 pm
A copy of the Court’s June 10, 2024, order in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:14 pm
The trial judge agreed with the defendant’s position as did the appellate court in Malecaj v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 10:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Apparently, they failed to address the plaintiff’s claim that the accident had “exacerbated preexisting injuries to the plaintiff's right shoulder and the cervical and lumbar regions of her spine. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am
Assuming, without deciding, that plaintiffs’ claims under Judiciary Law § 487 are timely, Supreme Court correctly granted defendant’s motion. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:16 pm
Duffy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
The plaintiff, a stockholder of the Company, argued that these provisions violated Sections 141(a) and 141(c) of the DGCL. [read post]
