Search for: "Pointer v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
Howard Friedman (Religion Clause) for the pointer. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:17 am
My amicus brief urging the opposite result (in a different case that raises the same issue) is here, though that brief was written before the Supreme Court’s decision last year in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
Const. 5th, 6th Amends. and Pointer v Texas, Washington v Texas and Tanford v Bocchino. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:37 pm
United States, 521 US 898, 925–31 (1997). [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:32 am
Thanks to Larry Seltzer for the pointer. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:07 pm
From Weisenbach v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 7:23 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:52 am
” Likewise, in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
Howard Friedman [Religion Clause] and Victor Steinbok for the pointer); so I thought I’d repost the item I wrote about the trial court decision in March:There’s been much talk about the trial court decision in Mansour v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:57 am
The Assembly recalls that the European Court of Human Rights has already stated in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and others v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm
In Troxel v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm
In Troxel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:37 am
However, the Supreme Court stated that ‘no single key’ could be determinative of status. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
Newsom v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Thus, the Excessive Fines Clause is violated where the fine is “grossly disproportional to the gravity of [the) offense” (United States v Bajakajlan, 524 US 321, 334 [1998]; see Canavan, 1 NY3d at 140). [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:15 pm
That’s not a crime under North Carolina law, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held today in State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:37 am
United States (1983); Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
Austria, 13470/87, 20 September 1994; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 17419/90, 25 November 1996; İ.A. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
United States, 543 F.3d 129 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
