Search for: "Points v. Points"
Results 141 - 160
of 90,624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2022, 1:02 pm
The authors thank Jay V. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:27 am
In the case, Marina Point Development Associates, et al (collectively Marina Point) appeal the district court's judgment on the merits in favor of Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of Fawnskin (collectively the Center) on their claims under the Clean Water Act (CWA), and under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
The Court of Appeal had regard to the judgments in Pittalis v Grant (1989) QB 605, Rana v Ealing LBC (2018) EWCA Civ 2074, and Singh v Dass (2019) EWCA Civ 360 to find: there is no general rule that a case needs to be “exceptional” before a new point will be allowed to be taken on appeal. [read post]
16 May 2019, 1:51 pm
The good news is that drafters of construction contracts throughout the world can now have a well-deserved good night’s sleep courtesy of the English Court of Appeal’s March 2019 decision in Triple Point Technology, Inc. v PTT Public Company Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 230. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
v=WRbsz1Ha7Zo [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:35 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:53 am
Concrete Prods. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Complaint Point 3 Nike(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })(); [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:34 am
Our discussion of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 9:15 am
Outside counsel points back at Qualcomm, saying they never had [...] [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:06 am
” Additionally, SFFA asserts that West Point’s policies violate “every” principle from Students For Fair Admissions v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:22 pm
The post Tenancy Deposit protection and points from the Khuja v Chowdhury case appeared first on The Landlord Law Blog. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:23 pm
Remy, which is an on-point precedent.] [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Under this system, applicants for entry or stay in the United Kingdom are required to establish that they have accumulated a set number of points in accordance with detailed provisions specified in the Immigration Rules; if the requisite number of points are achieved the applicant may be given leave to enter or remain; if they are not their application will be refused. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
See Simmons v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 2:53 pm
From State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 3:35 am
"Turning Point: The Supreme Court; The court is political, and more than Roe v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:56 pm
” — even less controversial point. [read post]
2 May 2019, 2:22 pm
The only reason the point was raised before the Constitutional Court was because the professional advisers to the applicant had not thought of the point before. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:13 pm
Tags: class actions, Supreme Court, Wal-Mart Related posts Ted on the SEC and Stoneridge (3) Ted Frank on the Dukes v. [read post]
