Search for: "Pooler v State" Results 141 - 160 of 307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2020, 6:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Newman, Pooler and Hall) states that "administrative closure" of a lawsuit, as one of the "most drastic alternatives" available to a district court, "should be used sparingly and only as a last resort. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This challenge arises in a criminal prosecution where the guy used a gun in the course of drug trafficking.The case is United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:19 am
On August 24, 2018, in a rare, 73-page decision interpreting the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The jury awarded each of them $18 million, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Restivo v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is a fairly straightforward search and seizure case where the Second Circuit says the police were able to nail a guy for having an unlicensed gun at the wrong place at the wrong time.The case is United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case is rejected under Rule 12.The case is Fahs Construction v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 1:33 pm by Steve Statsinger
Here are two per curiams in white collar cases, decided on the same day.First, in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:04 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This state-law issue is sufficiently complex that the Second Circuit (Pooler, Lynch and Park) is certifying it for review by the New York State Court of Appeals.The case is Brooklyn Center for Psychotherapy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" This became the Central Park Karen case, which has reached the Second Circuit.The case is Cooper v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"Judge Pooler dissents, stating that the majority's interpretation of the Complaint is far too narrow. [read post]