Search for: "Pounds v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2019, 7:34 am
Facts: This case (Clark v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:25 pm
Almost all the successful United States lawsuits against healthcare providers for unilateral withdrawal were based on a tort theory of outrage or intentional infliction of emotional distress. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:26 pm
" [See Allen v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
They argued that, following the Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) judgment (among other things), the ERO was obliged to add their names to the electoral register. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
United States, 96 U. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Supreme Court issued its much anticipated opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:08 am
The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia recently employed this burden shifting framework in Ruggles v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:44 am
EvidenceProf Blog notes that in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 573, 585-86 (1980). [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 573, 585-86 (1980). [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:53 am
They also claimed that they had lost the opportunity to be involved in the making of a full-length documentary about the re-issue of Infinite and in total claimed £288,209.00.LTEV sold 2,891 copies of the Infinite to the dealer for £7.75 per unit, giving a profit of around £2.50 per unit. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:01 am
Lerner, who heads the IRS’s tax-exemption division, described the targeting campaign as a misguided attempt to deal with a wave of applications after the 2010 Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am
I have recently dealt in detail with the position under the English law in comparison to the stronger protections in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
That argument was rejected citing the case of the United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:35 am
In Robey v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
A discussion of the R.P. and others v United Kingdom case (see above). [read post]
