Search for: "Powers v. Common Council" Results 141 - 160 of 1,325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Eugenia Lostri, Stephanie Pell
Pillar II: Disrupt and Dismantle Threat Actors As the new strategy begins by recognizing the range of significant threats posed by malicious actors, Pillar II opens with the statement: “The United States will use all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:17 am by Frank Cranmer
  COVID restrictions in Canada In New Brunswick v His Tabernacle Family Church Inc. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
AFME identifies debt products as the most common form of natural capital finance, and the instruments share similar characteristics with other green finance debt products. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
The surveillance practice was reportedly authorized under the Investigatory Powers Act, which critics claim gives security services too much power to collect the data of innocent people. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:40 am by David Post
[A few more words about the constitutional status of animal cruelty laws ] In a posting a few days ago, I discussed the Nat'l Pork Producers' Council v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by kblocher@hslf.org
Supreme Court is considering its ruling in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Matthew Levitt
The EU’s Designation Process Explained The EU’s legal basis for designating a terrorist group is Common Position 931, or CP 931, created in 2001 as a means of implementing U.N. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:17 am by Kenneth Propp
Law enforcement agencies’ powers to collect evidence stored in foreign jurisdiction have also recently garnered increased attention. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:04 am by Matrix Law
The Supreme Court considers the judgment in Hall & Co Ltd v Shoreham-by-Sea Urban District Council[1964] 1 WLR 240, which considered the circumvention of the relevant compulsory purchase regime by a purported planning condition. [read post]