Search for: "Powers v. Thomas"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2024, 11:11 am
” Justice Thomas authored a concurring opinion arguing that Chevron deference also violates the Constitution’s separation of powers. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:05 am
In Hewitt v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:46 am
And things are moving: just today (July 2), the Court remanded nine cases “for further consideration in light of Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:52 am
From today's opinion by Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Gorsuch, dissenting from the denial of review in Doe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:24 pm
In Moody v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:48 pm
Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:48 pm
Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:48 pm
Trump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 10:04 am
Except that Texas's law limits their power to do so. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 10:00 am
In Jarkesy v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:19 am
In today's Moody v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 8:34 am
In a 6-3 decision, the justices overruled the 1984 Chevron v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 7:51 am
The case, US v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:29 am
Concurring opinions Justice Thomas noted that Chevron not only curbed the courts’ judicial powers but simultaneously expanded agencies’ executive power beyond constitutional limits. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
This judicially created doctrine serves as a powerful shield for government officials, particularly law enforcement officers, against civil lawsuits. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
This judicially created doctrine serves as a powerful shield for government officials, particularly law enforcement officers, against civil lawsuits. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
This judicially created doctrine serves as a powerful shield for government officials, particularly law enforcement officers, against civil lawsuits. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 9:19 am
Murthy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm
Jarkesy v. [read post]