Search for: "Price v. Phillips" Results 141 - 160 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm by INFORRM
The importance of the role of the media to the principle of open justice is nothing new: see, eg Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, there were hearings in the cases of BW Legal Services Limited v Glassdoor, Inc before Jay J; Dudley v Phillips before Saini J, and; XXX v Persons Unknown before Chamberlain J. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
“Mr Andre accepted a public apology from Ms Price at the High Court in London”. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Phillips, who used his ten minutes to good advantage. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Giles Peaker
The consultation requirement applies to a “set of works” (Phillips v Francis (2014) EWCA Civ 1395), and if a contractor engaged to carry out a set of works is unable to complete it there is no requirement for a fresh consultation about the same set of works, even if the price is going to go up (as it normally will if the original contractor gave the cheapest quote), and even if  the tenant’s contribution i [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:47 am by Lisa Stam
 This is the question in Phonedog v Noah Kavitz, a California case that will no doubt have an impact in Canada. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:23 pm by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
 California Courts have taken this lenient approach because ‘the law and facts to promote the beneficial purposes of the homestead legislation to benefit the debtor’” [Phillips v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
 In the Courts Australia    Aaren Pty Ltd trading as Price Beat Travel v Arya [2020] NSWDC 657 – the defendant was dissatisfied with the services she received from the plaintiff’s travel agency when flying to India. [read post]