Search for: "Price v. R & A Sales" Results 141 - 160 of 2,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
  Thus a $.25 price premium applied to 1 million in unit sales amounts to $250,000 in damages. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm by Robert Guite and Abby Meyer
  Thus a $.25 price premium applied to 1 million in unit sales amounts to $250,000 in damages. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Scammer/Spammer is convicted under the CAN-SPAM act for using spam email to pump up the price of penny stocks, which he then sold for a profit. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Asus sought to pay Philips’ FRAND rate but only on UK past sales rather than global past sales. [read post]
’s quiet title action against the purchaser of real property at a foreclosure sale, an HOA, and the HOA’s agent. [read post]
CMS again finalized reimbursement for drugs acquired under the 340B program at the average sales price (ASP) minus 22.5 percent. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Policy responses in recent years have included banning common carrier delivery of cigarettes,[6] greater law enforcement activity on interstate roads,[7] differential tax rates near low-tax jurisdictions,[8] and cracking down on tribal reservations that sell tax-free cigarettes.[9] However, the underlying problem remains: high cigarette taxes amount to a “price prohibition” on the legal product in many U.S. states.[10] International Smuggling and Counterfeiting Puts Consumers… [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:29 pm by Mark Summerfield
In a significant judgment, the High Court of Australia has changed an aspect of patent law in Australia, ruling by a 4-3 majority that the first sale of a patented product exhausts the patentee’s exclusive rights in that product: Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation [2020] HCA 41. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:13 pm by Mark Ashton
 But for those who have a house that’s underwater (debt exceeds sales price less commission/transfer taxes) there are things worth knowing. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
The litigation arose out of the parties’ disagreement over post-closing purchase price adjustments arising out of the sale […] [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 12:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Since the coronavirus outbreak emerged earlier this year, I have been tracking the COVID-19-related securities class action lawsuits and writing about each of the cases as they have come in. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am by Keith Mallinson
  The US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]