Search for: "Price v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 11,982
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2013, 8:30 am
Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law, has posted "The Price of Privacy, 1973 to the Present." [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:23 am
Acadia Motors, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:36 pm
On January 28, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a federal district court decision that had struck down most of the regulations on the sales of alcoholic beverages imposed by the State of Washington in Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
On 8 November 2018, Mr Justice Warby handed down judgment in the case of Price v MGN Ltd [2018] EWHC 3014 (QB). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
Does 1-2 et. al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm
Price, No. 11-0495/AR, and United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:52 am
In the blog post, the FTC includes a previous Statement of Interest (“SOI”) filed in the Duffy v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 7:32 am
The denial of review in New York State Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co., et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:01 am
The State also argued under Norris v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 8:07 am
In the SH Synergy, LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:59 am
Earlier this year the US Congressional hearings into drug prices in the US hit the headlines. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
In Veritas Software Corp. et. al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:38 am
White v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:59 pm
v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:23 am
Illinois, which stated that indirect purchasers were unable to bring suits forward. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:36 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:29 am
See KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Elements of a Defective Pricing Claim There are five essential elements of a defective pricing claim. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:06 am
California now joins Illinois, New York and Michigan (see March 31, 2008 Post) in treating resale price maintenance as a per se offense in violation of its state antitrust law even though such conduct is subject to rule of reason review under section 1 of the Sherman Act after Leegin Creative Lether Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
