Search for: "Price v. State ex rel. Price"
Results 141 - 160
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2016, 11:06 am
Touzot v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 12:21 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:09 pm
Bank of the United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
The Northern District of Illinois approved the $28.5 million final settlement of the action styled US ex rel. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:06 pm
In addition, after review of the evidence, the Board held that the subject products were relatively low priced and subject to impulse purchases. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
Coscia would then `repeat[ ] his strategy in the opposite direction,’ reselling the low-price contracts he purchased at a high price, or buying back the high-price contracts he sold at a low price. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Relative value of the celebrity use is effectively the fourth fair use factor folded into transformativeness. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
Jaroslawicz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 7:58 pm
The settlement of the case U.S. ex rel. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
Harris v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
See, e.g., People ex rel. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:03 am
” Although we acknowledge that this is not an ideal way to resolve a dispute implicating reproductive rights, we note that “what is even worse … is to give a possibly antagonized ex-spouse the power to either block parentage or to name the price that potential parentage will cost. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:16 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
United States, 14-916, which involves a provision of the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 stating that contracting officers at the Department of Veterans Affairs “shall award” contracts on the basis of competition restricted to small businesses owned by veterans whenever there is a “reasonable expectation” that two or more such businesses will bid for the contract at “a fair and reasonable price that… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
