Search for: "Price v. Taylor" Results 141 - 160 of 266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
 There is a news item about the case on the David Price Solicitors and Advocates website (which makes the Defendants’ Skeleton Argument available [pdf]). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:05 pm
 The Kats are all grateful to Katfriend and occasional guest blogger Paul England (Taylor Wessing) for teasing out the relevant facts and explaining them so succinctly here:Factual Background SDL Hair Ltd v Next Row Ltd & others [2014] EWHC 2084 is the inquiry as to damages judgment of Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, that followed the decision of 14 June 2013 on liability by Mr Recorder Richard Meade QC [noted on PatLit here]. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
Both decisions thus relied on the Fourth Circuit’s earlier ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:39 am
In another, wiretapping was used to charge gas stations in a price-fixing scheme.April 22 — British Columbia — Wakeling v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 5 February 2014 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Adamson & Ors v Paddico Ltd; Taylor (on behalf of the Society for the Protection of Markham and Little Francis) v Betterment Properties Ltd; and Richardson & Anor v Director of Public Prosecutions. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
The court in AB v CD [2014] EWHC 1 (QB) (03 January 2014) considered that the latter position was the law, but expressed doubts as to its correctness. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
Given that there is no liability on the defendant, the defendant’s third party claim is dismissed.Read the decision at: Taylor’s Feed & Tires Ltd v Brennan Farms Ltd. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:45 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 126242 (SD GA, Sept. 4, 2013), a Georgia federal magistrate judge recommended that an inmate be permitted to proceed on his complaint that defendant improperly ended his religious meals.In Taylor v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:43 am
Fortunately, the Delaware Chancery Court recently issued a decision, entitled Edgewater Growth Capital Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 8:43 am by Sheppard Mullin
Fortunately, the Delaware Chancery Court recently issued a decision, entitled Edgewater Growth Capital Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
In a neat segue from rubber to plastic, the IPKat wonders how many readers have yet encountered  Taylor v Taylor Made Plastics, a curious decision of the US District Court in Tampa, Florida, which marries -- if that be the appropriate word --  the doctrines of IP and family law. [read post]