Search for: "Price v. U.s.*"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court decided this week the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court decided this week the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:37 am
Harris v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 5:30 am
We will be following the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
As she has done with past cases, Jill Browning provides the following same-day analysis of the Supreme Court oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
As she has done with past cases, Jill Browning provides the following same-day analysis of the Supreme Court oral arguments in Bilski v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
In Huppe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Exploiting the price differential between the US and overseas can be quite profitable. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
Price v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 1:53 pm
Similarly, if the Change Directive is reducing the amount of the Contractor’s work, it should include the amount of the associated price decrease or schedule acceleration. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:48 am
In Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:42 pm
The punchline here is that Judge Ericksen rejects the FTC’s claim that the two drugs, Indocin and NeoProfen, are in the same relevant market as a matter of law and concludes that Lundbeck has raised a triable issue of fact on market definition: Lundbeck maintains that doctors distinguish Indocin from NeoProfen based on clinical and safety attributes and that doctors do not switch between the drugs based on price. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:18 pm
Bayshore, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 8:00 am
Marcoux et al v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 11:05 am
" Employer opposed the motion.Analysis: The USDC for Maryland denied Competitor's motion following the ruling in Aloha Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:02 am
Any implication that a provision in the Agreement that Weaver might receive 25% of the sale price of the company indicated an ownership interest was negated by the right of first refusal provision in the Agreement, which would require Weaver to pay the same price as a third-party bidder, indicating no such ownership interest.The judge concluded that, except for any compensation due to Weaver under the Agreement, for which calculation sufficient information has already been… [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
The elements of a wrongful foreclosure claim are: (1) a defect in the foreclosure-sale proceedings; (2) an inadequate selling price; and (3) a causal connection between the defect and the inadequate selling price. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:35 pm
In Klein v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
