Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue"
Results 141 - 160
of 837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, and STEFFANIE DANIELLE CACCIATORE, Appellees. 4th District. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 9:55 am
. #9 et al v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
On Tuesday 16 March, the Supreme Court will hear the case of BF (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:35 am
In Forrestall Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Agency 2024 NY Slip Op 03118 Decided on June 6, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Agency 2024 NY Slip Op 03118 Decided on June 6, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Donziger is an extension of the civil RICO case of Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
There are several factors that may trigger an audit, including (i) information included on a retirement plan’s annual return (Form 5500), (ii) participant complaints, (iii) referrals from other agencies such as the Department of Labor or Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, (iv) determination letter applications, and (v) random selection by the IRS. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:45 pm
The post Department of Labor Issues Regulations on Families First Coronavirus Response Act appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:56 am
By Jaye Calhoun, Jason Brown and Willie Kolarik In Camp v. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 6:07 am
I think that this holding is not only unwise but inconsistent with prior Supreme Court precedent in Taft v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 10:15 am
On Monday, October 24, the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) confirmed that it did not appeal the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Trafigura Trading LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
The two key cases are Province of Bombay v Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay [1947] AC 58 and Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council [1990] 2 AC 580. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 11:33 am
Montana Department of Revenue (Jan. 22) This post was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:03 pm
From the Washington Post: The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service announced on Thursday that they would treat legal same-sex marriages the same as heterosexual marriages for federal tax purposes. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:26 am
The current (still in effect) guidelines worksheet remains at the Massachusetts Department of Revenue's website and should be replaced with the newly revised worksheet when the new guidelines go into effect on August 1.Following is a summary of the key revisions, as provided in the trial court's press release:Summary of Key Changes to the Existing GuidelinesThe 2012 Child Support Guidelines Task Force recommended a number of clarifications and changes. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:07 am
With the Kappos v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:27 am
Department of Revenue of Illinois10 and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:17 am
Kappos v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
