Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice" Results 141 - 160 of 2,077
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
In February, Justice Kagan joked that the Supreme Court justices “are not the nine greatest experts on the Internet. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Moritz, decided Mar. 31 by the Nebraska Supreme Court (in an opinion by Justice John Freudenberg, joined by Chief Justice Michael Heavican and Justices Stephanie Stacy and Jonathan Papik): At issue in this appeal is whether social media posts directed toward local public figures from a public account of an officer of a local bank constituted misconduct in connection with work disqualifying the employee from unemployment benefits. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 7:22 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  The Biden Administration's Department of Justice is beating on the Supreme Court's door to hear Rahimi, which has bad facts, but it may slow walk Range because it has good facts. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Brian Greer
In contrast, the Department of Defense, which has multiple agencies and departments within its sprawling organization, has over 1,500 guides! [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:34 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Bruce Brown and Gabe Rottman analyzed the Justice Department’s regulation prohibiting the use of subpoenas, search warrants, and court orders to demand records from members of the press. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
In 2020, the proposal was vetted by the federal interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which is comprised of representatives from 16 U.S. departments and agencies, including Treasury, Justice, Commerce, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
As the Supreme Court recognized, “collective criminal agreement—partnership in crime—presents a greater potential threat to the public than individual delicts. . . . [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:11 am by Richard Frank
Later this month the justices will hear arguments in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  In Percoco, the Court held that a private citizen does not owe the public a duty to provide honest services simply because he has strong influence over government decisions, again abrogating contrary Second Circuit precedent. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:13 am by Krzysztof Pacula
Written by Zuzanna Nowicka, lawyer at the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and lecturer at Department of Logic and Legal Argumentation at University of Warsaw In the aftermath of the judgment of the ICJ of 2012 in the case of the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
United States (Federal criminal jurisdiction of tribal citizen in Indian country)Sulgrove v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm by John A. Emmons
The Justice Department on Tuesday released a Tampa Grand Jury’s indictment in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am by Elizabeth Goitein
The only limitation is a general admonition, set forth in the Attorney General’s Guidelines for Domestic FBI Operations, that “[a]ll activities under these Guidelines must have a valid purpose consistent with these Guidelines, and must be carried out in conformity with the Constitution and all applicable statutes, executive orders, Department of Justice regulations and policies, and Attorney General guidelines. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
The problem is that the Justice Department declined to bring such charges. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The claim concerns a class action lawsuit which accuses Google and its AI department of misusing patient data stored by a kidney injury alert app. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 4:17 am by jonathanturley
We have previously written about attempts of police departments to criminally charge citizens for filming them in public, an effort that I have long criticized. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 6:14 am by Chip Merlin
What can departments of insurance do to prevent improper uses of claims leakage goals? [read post]