Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of State" Results 141 - 160 of 3,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2024, 1:03 pm by NARF
Mendocino County Sheriff's Office (Public Law 280; Tribal Law Ordinances; Cannabis) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html South Point Energy Center LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  With partisan division in Congress barring passage of any measure to react to the Supreme Court’s 2010 campaign finance decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Hashemi, 2012 QCCA 1449 (CanLII) has upheld state immunity for torture of Canadian citizens abroad. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Kent
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm by Unknown
Department of the Interior (Tribal Constitutions)Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
 (Mossoff, 4) ("[A] public right is a privilege granted to or created in a citizen 'in connection with the performance of the constitutional functions of the executive or legislative departments.' ") (quoting Crowell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
Virtually all matters at stake in a public-sector labor agreement impact the public fisc, and thus, are matters of public policy concerning all citizens. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 9:02 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On September 16, 2015, the federal government decided to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the case of Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix
Whilst the Divisional Court did not accept all the Secretary of State’s apprehensions, they did accept them for the most part and in particular that it was credible that the Iranian government might retaliate by taking action against local embassy staff of against UK citizens: see [36]. [read post]