Search for: "Quinn v. State of California"
Results 141 - 160
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:54 am
As Apple notes, "Quinn Emanuel has 152 attorneys who have subscribed to the ITC protective order in the 794 Investigation [the investigation of Samsung's ITC complaint against Apple], nearly one quarter of the attorneys at Quinn Emanuel".Samsung argues that the identified disclosure doesn't really matter because a number of Samsung executives were already aware of the terms of the Apple-Nokia agreement due to what was discussed in a Dutch court. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am
Quinn (11-681): The issue is whether it is unconstitutional for a state to require home-care providers to pay fees to a union to represent their interests before state agencies. * Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 1:47 pm
For more on Dockery v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:52 pm
Arzoumanian v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
Marvell, who was represented by Quinn Emmanuel, alleged that information relating to prior art that should havebeen disclosed to the USPTO prior to grant was withheld and as such the patent was improperly obtained. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
At the end of my post on Apple's Black Friday motion to bring infringement claims against six more Samsung products in California I promised that I would report on the two Samsung v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:52 pm
In the Oracle v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:26 am
Quinn Emanuel is also Samsung's counsel in the ongoing California trial (where it just achieved a significant improvement for its client ahead of jury deliberations).Motorola filed a companion lawsuit (over the same seven patents) against Apple with the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.These are the seven patents-in-suit in the ITC action (and the companion federal lawsuit) along with the descriptions Google (Motorola) and infringement… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:15 am
Samsung jury trial in California got underway on Tuesday. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
Moreover, in contrast to states like Arizona, which require employers within their states to use the federal government’s E-Verify pilot program to verify their employees’ work eligibility, in 2007 Illinois sought to prohibit use of E-Verify within the state until concerns about the accuracy, effectiveness, and privacy of the new federal database system could be resolved. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
The bill comes in response to a recent decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals in DeWolfe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:28 am
PB Farradyne, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:56 pm
My one word answer: California. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
In Rozenblat v. [read post]
