Search for: "R. J. F."
Results 141 - 160
of 7,197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 7:01 am
Stocks, bonds, notes, and other investments; e. f. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:44 am
Por eso debo ser agradecido con los escritores de los inolvidables tebeos de Bruguera, y particularmente con ese fénix de los ingenios de las historietas, que fue Francisco Ibáñez, que por cierto, no se vio librado de litigios pues fue célebre su lucha judicial contra la editorial por los derechos de propiedad intelectual; eran tiempos en que la empresa editorial trataba a los autores como galeotes y el fruto quedaba para la empresa (quizá como… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Fuerst and Robert J. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:48 am
Michael R. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
R., 2023 QCCA 825Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Mark Schrager, Stephen W. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 9:11 am
[…] Er dankt Gunhilt Kersten für ihr langjähriges Engagement für einen wirksamen und praxisnahen Datenschutz sowie für die Durchsetzung des Öffentlichkeitsprinzips. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 9:11 am
[…] [Der Regierungsrat] dankt Gunhilt Kersten für ihr langjähriges Engagement für einen wirksamen und praxisnahen Datenschutz sowie für die Durchsetzung des Öffentlichkeitsprinzips. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm
It would be useful to borrow from Steven Chong, J’s reading of the doctrine in BCY v BCZ, which is also a case of the Singapore High Court that applied the composite approach of Sulamerica. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:11 am
Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse)Decision Date: October 29, 2021 The Supreme Court of Canada held that jokes made by a comedian—Mike Ward—at the expense of a famous, disabled child—Jérémy Gabriel—did not amount to a discriminatory violation of Mr. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
Terris, Stephen J. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:45 am
Philbin, Scott F. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 1:53 pm
f) El producto de la venta o del arrendamiento de los inmuebles que se construya con sus recursos; g) Los intereses que perciban por sus depósitos y los créditos que otorgue; h) Los valores que se emite y coloque el Banco de la Vivienda del Perú; i) Los créditos internos o externos que obtenga; y j) Las transferencias a título gratuito que reciba previa aceptación y… [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:49 pm
R. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:20 am
Penseur de la complexité, l’auteur, jamais, n’assène une vérité, mais préfère, au contraire, interroger sans cesse. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:28 pm
A Conjoint Experiment on Social Networks, Violence, and Forced Migration Decisions in Eastern and Southeastern Turkey Michael F Joseph, Do Different Coercive Strategies Help or Hurt Deterrence? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:11 pm
I am delighted to pass along the news that Dini Sejko's excellent article, "Sovereign Investors as ICSID Claimants: Lessons from the Drafting Documents and the Case Law," has been published in the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 56(3):853-903, 2023.The abstract lays out the principal arguments:Abstract: The prominence of state-controlled entities (SCEs) in foreign direct investment (FDI) flows has created multilayer regulatory challenges. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
