Search for: "R. W. Day Development, LLC"
Results 141 - 160
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South Africa): (Afro-IP), 15-16 September: US ACI 10th advanced forum on biotech… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, EPA will receive written comments relating to the settlement. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here North Idaho Developers Fined Nearly $45K for Storm Water Violations. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– Donald W. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
We took a look, but first we had to eliminate those states that, for one reason or another, generally preclude punitive damages, allowing drug and device manufacturers to enjoy The Day of the Dove in common-law cases. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
That same day the County moved to dismiss Nissen's complaint under [Court Rules] 12(b)(6). [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
District Judge Roger W. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
If the parties cannot resolve their differences by telephone conference, then each agrees to schedule a day of mediation with the Mediator within thirty (30) days to resolve the disputes and to share the costs of the same equally. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
The agency says Rio Algom Mining LLC has agreed to investigate levels of contamination at 1 of its sites near Gallup N.M. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
But, Primus sees it differently:“I understand 96 seems incongruous,” the legal counsel for Primus, attorney Jeffrey Whittington of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLC, has said. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
But Primus sees it differently: “I understand 96 seems incongruous,” the legal counsel for Primus, attorney Jeffrey Whittington of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLC, has said. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The court held that it lacked subject mater jurisdiction over plaintiffs' Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. 2402, claims because plaintiffs filed their lawsuit one day after the FTCA's statute of limitations had run. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
The reports, also known as Form R Reports, include additional information regarding waste management, recycling and reduction of these toxic chemicals. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
– EPA News Release, August 11, 2010 International Minerals Technology, LLC, of The Woodlands, Texas, has agreed to pay a $30,000 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the federal Clean Water Act at its Tetra Micronutrients production facility in Fairbury, Neb. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
In re TC Heartland, LLC, No. 2016-105, at 10 (Fed. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Salazar, No. 08-1097ADEA - Burdens of proof + bifurcation issueso o SCOTUS docket hereFederal Appellate Court DecisionsØ Ø Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here5th Circuit> Braymiller v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
Because one day, he or she may be forced to pay attorney’s fees quantified in the manner ordained by this Court’s precedent, whether or not they ever sought [read post]
