Search for: "R.C.M. v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2008, 2:04 pm
CAAF released its opinion today in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Yesterday CAAF docketed two certified issues in an Air Force case:WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A SANITY BOARD FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF FACTUAL PERSUASION TO JUSTIFY… [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 1:38 pm
An Air Force JAG certificate of review was filed at CAAF today, seeking review of the Air Force Court's unpublished decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 2:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:48 am
The Maynard case from the Army is probably the most interesting of the six:WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE COMMITTED PLAIN ERROR IN ALLOWING PANEL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER EVIDENCE OF APPELLANT'S ALLEGED ANTI-AMERICAN AND ANTI-WAR VIEWS AS AGGRAVATION EVIDENCE UNDER R.C.M. 1001(b)(4) TO THE OFFENSE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT LEAVE, THEREBY PREJUDICING APPELLANT'S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS.United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:41 pm
" [United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
" United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:06 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:34 pm
When United States v. [read post]
