Search for: "RESOLUTE INSURANCE COMPANY v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
"] From the Plea Agreement filed last week in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 3:00 am by Mark Dillman
State Farm General Insurance Company,1 the Central District of California issued an order denying State Farm’s motion... [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 7:44 am by David Adelstein
Government Employees Insurance Company, 2021 WL 4258821 (11th Cir. 2021) is a non-construction case that discusses the standard for pursuing a bad faith claim against an insurer. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
The insurance company breached section 5-1(e) of GDPR (“personal data shall be… kept in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary”) when it kept the personal data of 1917 prospects who had not had contact with the company for more than three years, 1405 of which for over five years. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:31 am by Al Saikali
Treasury’s press release states that SUEX was targeted because the company has allegedly “facilitate[d] illicit activities for their own illicit gains” and was not simply exploited by malicious actors (as is the case with other cryptocurrency exchanges). [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 4:05 pm by Unknown
Also, all other terms and conditions apply to the AZG Claims process, including but not limited to choice of law and dispute resolution provisions. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:34 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Ironically, NJ remains one of the few states grandfathered by federal legislation to take a reverse-offset allowing the employers and their insurance companies to take the offset. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Both of these issues were addressed by Washington State Supreme Court in Putman v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm by Bona Law PC
In parallel, FTC has also passed this month some new resolutions updating its rulemaking procedures to set stage for stronger deterrence of corporate misconduct, and authorizing investigations into key law enforcement priorities for the next decade. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 11; Creative Salmon Company Ltd. v. [read post]