Search for: "ROBIN W. MAY'S CASE." Results 141 - 160 of 234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
DIRTY W… http://t.co/MlCanRfrxA -> EC Privacy Advisers Detail PRISM Probe, Question Viability of US-EU Safe Harbor http://t.co/tIHBJM3Onf -> New book focuses on social media risks to businesses http://t.co/DtsuLMwxnp -> Canada faces an innovation vacuum http://t.co/Yb6iN3QZhM -> Sexy but too similar? [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
”5 The court took this to mean that “By using the words ‘entirely of an independent fixation’ in referring to sound recordings which may imitate or simulate the sounds of another, Congress may have intended that a recording containing any sounds of another recording would constitute infringement. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Press, May 2013), Reviewed by Financial Times. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
A prime example of this risk may be found in the different attitude of the courts on the issuance of injunctions in PAE cases. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  We again emphasize that there may well be errors in this data and hope that anyone who finds some mistakes will send in the corrections. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Joel R. Brandes
Robin S. transported the children to her home in Chautauqua County, New York. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:27 am by Roshonda Scipio
Redlich.Acker, James R., 1951-Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2011.Criminal LawKF9420 .S55 2011The language of perjury cases / Roger W. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Lawrence Higgins
[Link] The Emory Law Journal will hold The 2012 Randolph W. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
“[W]e are troubled by the lack of uniformity and certainty inherent in the case-by-case approach and fear the resulting disincentive for pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop new products. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
 The case stated that:  "[W]here an ornamental feature is claimed as a trademark and trademark protection would significantly hinder competition by limiting the range of alternative designs, the aesthetic functionality doctrine denies such protection. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:45 am by Ken Shigley
It was grand experience for a budding trial lawyer as we were constantly trying cases. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:03 am by Adam Wahlberg
It's there in large part to the work of Chris Messerly of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
Once those are decided and a prima facie case is established does the court proceed to the defense of functionality. [read post]