Search for: "ROSE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 141 - 160 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 2:34 pm by David Bernstein
Imagine, for example, if the ghost of Justice William Day, author of Hammer v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
Department of Justice (DOJ) unexpectedly announced that it would no longer defend the constitutionality of section 5000A of the ACA, the Individual Mandate. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
”[x] Under the GLBA, financial institutions, in actions brought by the Department of Justice only (there is no private right of action under GLBA), can be fined up to $100,000 for each violation, and directors and officers of financial institutions could be held personally liable for civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each violation. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
  All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Department of Justice, under the inauspicious leadership of Bill Barr, had the audacity to try and intervene on Trump’s behalf in a civil lawsuit brought by E. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:06 pm
"The lawyer for the President was asking the head of the Department of Justice to approve an illegal program. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
Michael Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Rose Gottemoeller, the former NATO deputy secretary general; and Pranay Vaddi, a fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  Only time shall tell if four Justices have true love’s passion for the question whether the Department of Labor improperly denied third-party home care companies the ability to avail themselves of statutory home-care overtime exemptions. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
September 20, 1987Robert Bork said that serving on the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Janice R. (14 NY3d 576 [2010], cert denied 562 U.S. 1136 [2011]), its earlier precedents, thereby greatly expanding the definition of who can obtain status as a parent and have standing to seek custody and visitation of a child. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Janice R. (14 NY3d 576 [2010], cert denied 562 U.S. 1136 [2011]), its earlier precedents, thereby greatly expanding the definition of who can obtain status as a parent and have standing to seek custody and visitation of a child. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Section 702 exemption thereby reflects what Justice Brennan calleda “solicitude” for “a means by which a religious community defines itself” in cases where the organization determines that its activities “are in furtherance of an organization’s religious mission, and that only those committed to that mission should conduct them. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]