Search for: "RULE REGARDING ATTORNEY S FEES"
Results 141 - 160
of 6,990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2020, 5:26 pm
So, any flat fee that worked out well for the attorney, in regards to work vs. results, might be a violation of this rule. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:11 pm
The Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed the district court’s ruling on the application of attorney fees under La. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 8:59 am
Tenenbaum, Judge Gertner has granted the RIAA's motion for costs and fees incurred in connection with its motion to compel production regarding dissemination of mp3 song files by the defendant's counsel during the lawsuit:Judge Nancy Gertner: Electronic ORDER entered granting [851] Motion for Costs and Fees Under Rule 37(a)(5). [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:17 am
The message for attorneys is twofold: Be mindful of the rules of your jurisdiction regarding legal fees, and read them very carefully. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:21 pm
The judge ruled that the nature of attorney’s fees follows from the nature of the principal award. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:18 pm
A trial court must make findings regarding the reasonableness of the fees in making an award. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:11 am
The Boston attorney's at the Law Office of Neil Burns field repeated inquiries regarding potential attorney malpractice and attorney's responsibility to their clients. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
” With regard to attorneys’ fees, Judge Daniels adopted Judge Peck’s conclusion that “the allegations in the complaint, along with Defendants’ default, are sufficient to justify the award of attorneys’ fees to Plaintiff,” and approved the reduction of 15% that Judge Peck made to the amount of fees the plaintiff sought. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 8:11 pm
The court’s reasoning here is that the “American rule” on fees (each party pays for its own attorney fees) is a strongly embedded and any statutory rejection of the rule must be “specific and explicit. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:03 am
After the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, the Defendants moved for an award of attorney’s fees claiming that they were the prevailing party under the CRRA. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 5:26 pm
So, any flat fee that worked out well for the attorney, in regards to work vs. results, might be a violation of this rule. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:31 pm
In other words, a trial court’s ruling on attorneys’ fees will not be reversed merely because reasonable people could disagree as to the proper outcome. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:55 am
The court went on to reverse the lower court’s denial of the plaintiffs’ request for attorney fees, noting that the parties’ contract provided for attorney fees and other damages to the prevailing party in the event of a suit to enforce the agreement. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:06 am
When assessing whether CAFA’s amount-in-controversy requirement is met, a court must include future attorneys’ fees recoverable by statute or contract, the Ninth Circuit ruled. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:54 pm
The second exception to the American Rule occurs when parties agree in a contract to a provision that permits the award of attorney’s fees. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:39 am
Weekly D1065aAttorney's fees -- Trial court erred in awarding attorney's fees at an hourly rate that exceeded the rate agreed to by party's attorney in noncontingent fee agreement -- Alternative fee recovery clause in fee agreement, which provided for an award of the greater of the contract fee or the amount awarded by the court, is unavailing where fee arrangement was not … [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:27 pm
The Justices spent their Tuesday morning considering when prevailing parties can recover attorney’s fees in patent cases. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:31 am
The Federal Circuit’s conclusion is that this “implies that attorney’s fees generally do not involve legal rights. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 5:58 am
” The trial court’s ruling that there was no fraud related to the double billing was thus affirmed, but the issue regarding the hourly rate was reversed and remanded. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:45 pm
In the aftermath of the Court’s final judgement, following numerous motions by the defendants for attorney’s fees, plaintiff separately appealed both the PTABs obviousness ruling and district court’s final judgment of non-infringement. [read post]
