Search for: "Randall Rader"
Results 141 - 160
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2012, 7:38 am
Chief Judge Randall Rader, 63, would be eligible for senior status in 2014. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 7:36 am
This morning track Patent Litigation started off with Appellate Advocacy at the Federal Circuit, with Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall Rader, John Whealan and Edward Reines, moderated by Ted Stevenson. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
Randall Rader, Chief Judge, U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
In the hope that she too may be a juror in a US patent trial, Merpel shows that she too is capable of understanding complex technology A few months ago Merpel's colleague the AmeriKat informed her of an interesting discussion that took place between US Chief Judge Randall Ray Rader and Sir Robin Jacob at IBIL's Young IP Lawyers event this summer. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 2:53 pm
The panel comprises: Professor David Vaver, Professor of IP Law, Osgoode Hall Law School Professor Lionel Bently, Director of the Centre for IP Law, University of Cambridge Judge Randall R. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm
And we weren’t disappointed – at least insofar as the decision, and Chief Judge Randall Rader’s dissent, provided some legal entertainment. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:12 pm
(a case have interesting features discussed elsewhere), Chief Judge Randall Rader (at right) opines eloquently regarding the so-called "tragedy of the anti-commons" and the widespread but unsupported idea that patents inhibit innovation (Justice Breyer to the contrary): The safe harbor provision at issue in this case, due to its origin and purpose in reversing Roche v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:46 pm
The opinion was authored by Chief Judge Randall Rader, who has often takes an expansive view of what can be patented. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:32 am
Chief Judge Randall Rader, 63, would be eligible for senior status in 2014. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:43 am
Rader gave the British last night at the Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture], avoiding the risk of remote and costly litigation for UK [and indeed non-UK?] [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
By Robert Gomulkiewicz Faculty Adviser Last summer, the University of Washington School of Law’s annual CASRIP High Tech Summit celebrated the elevation of Judge Randall R. [read post]
28 May 2012, 8:18 pm
Ambassador to the PRC, Judge Randall Rader, Chief Judge to the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:25 pm
Chief Judge Randall Rader, joined by judges Alan Lourie and Kimberly Moore, wrote the opinion affirming the damages awards in Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
Randall R. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:27 am
Says Sir Robin, "This is the best opportunity UK patent attorneys, solicitors and others will get to come to grips with the sea-changes in US law and practice" [this is no slur upon the excellent and entertaining Judge Randall Rader, who is reputed to know a thing or two about the subject but is coming to the same institution to speak on another subject]. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:30 am
Randall R. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:52 pm
Randall R. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
The panel, entitled, "Dialogue Between the Bench and Bar," featured a lively discussion between Seth Waxman, former Solicitor General of the United States and currently Partner at Wilmer Hale, and Chief Judge Randall Rader of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
The panel, entitled, "Dialogue Between the Bench and Bar," featured a lively discussion between Seth Waxman, former Solicitor General of the United States and currently Partner at Wilmer Hale, and Chief Judge Randall Rader of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:16 am
In succession to remarks he made this past Fall about the soaring costs of electronic discovery in IP cases and unveiling the Model Order Regarding E-Discovery in Patent Cases, Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall Rader recently told the ABA Section of IP Law that both the bar and the bench together, must continue to rein in the high costs of e-discovery. [read post]
