Search for: "Read v. Estate of Davis"
Results 141 - 160
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
The Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief on behalf of several trusts and estates law scholars and practitioners in the case of Ajemian v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:58 am
The defendants filed a motion to dismiss and the Judge made a nod in the direction of Twombly and its requirement that the plaintiff supply "'enough details about the subject matter of the case to present a story that holds together.'" Cardenas, slip op. at 4, quoting Estate of Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Circuit Affirms Laches Ruling Dismissing "REDSKINS" Cancellation CAFC Vacates TTAB's "MOSKOVSKAYA" Vodka Ruling, Clarifies 2(e)(3) Materiality TestCAFC Affirms TTAB's "AIRFLITE" Cancellation: Preparations for Use Not Enough for Service Mark RegistrationRecommended Reading:More Recommended Reading: Jordan Weinstein's TTAB Year in ReviewRecommended Reading: Sandra Edelman on Proving Bona Fide IntentRecommended Reading: Glenn… [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Read together, these cases cover much of CEQA’s fine parts. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm
MEPs have tabled laws that would forbid countries in the EU from breaking the electronic protection that prevents security services from reading messages sent via WhatsApp. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
Read the statement here. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
I encourage current and potential clients to read through these thoroughly. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
Implied consent can be read broadly. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:05 am
Might be a tough project, but one that could pay real dividends.If you're thinking about case notes, I recommend a serious look at Jones v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
”[21] Under this test, Ginger Rogers and the estate of Fred Astaire could not prevent a filmmaker from using the title “Ginger and Fred” in a fictional film because the use was “clearly related to the content of the movie and is not a disguised advertisement for the sale of goods or services or a collateral commercial product. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 3:50 am
In an attempt to gain the latest insights on strategy, finance, human resources, outsourcing, and IT, I eagerly read every issue of Harvard Business Review. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows: (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred eighty-four thousand dollars of the payor's annual income; provided, however, beginning March first, two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes in the consumer … [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 12:00 pm
Birthday of Jefferson Davis, June 3. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:26 pm
’ ‘McCain v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
The case is New Line Cinema v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Rev. 1159 (2009/2010) Rachel Bell, ARTICLE: Estate of Pew v. [read post]
