Search for: "Receivables Purchasing Co. v. R & R" Results 141 - 160 of 937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2007, 12:24 pm
The Insureds had purchased an optional endorsement under the policy which provided additional coverage equal to what they would have received if the inadequately insured motorist at fault for the accident had $1,000,000 of coverage. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Co. (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 238, 513 N.E.2d 253, (an indemnity agreement);2) First Capital Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
A perfect time to offer vacationing readers summaries of a few recent decisions of interest involving disputes between business co-owners. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
A perfect time to offer vacationing readers summaries of a few recent decisions of interest involving disputes between business co-owners. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
The loss calculation was wrong because it should have reflected the difference between the amount of benefits that he actually received and the amount that he would have received but for the false statement. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 8:14 pm by Mark Summerfield
  Furthermore, the patent is registered in the name of one owner (Bacchus) even though, in truth, the rights are co-owned by Mr Scott’s company, in order to better satisfy the requirements for Bacchus to receive a government grant to assist in commercialisation of the invention.The true circumstances have come to light because Bacchus got into financial difficulties and was placed in administration. [read post]