Search for: "Resort Property Holdings, LLC"
Results 141 - 160
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
NLRB and Venetian Casino Resort v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Then there’s 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:26 am
Clews Land and Livestock, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:59 pm
Basic Holding, Inc., 581 F.3d 1317, 1324 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Whitney Point Central School, 222 N.Y.S.2d 678, 679-80, 15 A.D.2d 191, 191-93 (3d Dep’t 1961) (holding the “contraction of mumps by a first-grade school teacher during an epidemic” to “fit precisely within this definition” of an accidental injury, including a deter [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Smith, supra, at 462–63; see also Azure Networks, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
The first time around, Epic's lawyers may have vastly overestimated her ability to read and understand Kodak as well as Epic's pleadings without a lot more hand-holding from counsel.While Epic had reasons not to expose Judge YGR's triple error on the foremarket part of the single-brand market theory, I still hope that the Ninth Circuit judges and their clerks will figure it out. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
The case involved a First Amendment challenge to the denial of a tax exemption for a church-owned property occupied by a couple whom the church designated as its ministers. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
To be clear, we do not hold that there was no objective manifestation of mutual assent here as a matter of law. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am
” See e-ventures Worldwide, LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
The FEC stalemated in a vote over whether to issue a more severe fine, one that would hold him personally liable. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Or is the corporation merely property, a complex commodity? [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm
The violations include soliciting money from property owners in exchange for a “pass” on certain inspections. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
Under the settlement with Clean Water Action, Horsehead Holding Corp. of Monaca will pay $15,000 for past violations and will contribute $25,000 to two environmental projects. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The trial court sustained the Board’s demurrer without leave to amend, holding that the registration was exempt from CEQA as a ministerial act. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
