Search for: "Richard E. Settle v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm
Time settled the case with Schafer before retrial. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:10 am
” As the court said in Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741, "it is well settled that hearsay is admissible in administrative hearings and may form the basis of an adverse determination. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Richard J. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm
Justice Department and various state attorneys general negotiated settlements with publishers alleged to have colluded and charged above-market prices for e-books. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Colo. 1983)(same);andnbsp; Bateman Eichler Hill andamp; Richards v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
Ellison, Ann V. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:42 pm
Bar v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:35 pm
The NCAA has reached settlements with other schools concerning infractions and the agreement with Penn State seemed like another example.But as Richard notes to me in an e-mail, the phrase "consent decree" is normally used by government actors (e.g., courts, the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission etc.) when settling claims with private parties. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 6:58 am
Feldberg v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:03 am
Richard Arthur, then serving as the office’s Director of Administration. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
The phrase involuntarily leapt to mind when I read the recent post-trial decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in Suffolk Anesthesiology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
E. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:49 am
Interestingly, Nollan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:30 am
(Wry v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
Of course, this does not settle the theoretical question. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:54 am
This intent, communicated in e-mail was part of the record. [read post]
