Search for: "Richard v. Gray" Results 141 - 160 of 233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2011, 12:32 pm
Gray, 262 Ga.App. at 233–234 (crossing center line and operating vehicle without a proper license did not warrant imposition of punitive damages); Miller v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(Just an Examiner) Clean tech in court: Green patent complaint update (Green Patent Blog) Guest post: Mark Twain’s patent interference (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC on BPAI in In re Leithem: “This conclusory analysis is hardly persuasive (IPBiz) CAFC finds construction of term unnecessary: Respironics v Invacare (nonprecedential) (GRAY on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking statute is constitutional: Luka v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:15 pm
  The film's cinéma vérité style relies heavily on 1960s archival footage shot by Hope Ryden and the photography of Gray Villet. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Paul, Min.: West, c2011 KF3783 .N65 2011 See Catalog Collective liability (International law) ACCOUNTABILITY FOR COLLECTIVE WRONG DOING / EDITED BYTRACY ISAACS, RICHARD VERNON Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011 KZ7075 .A923 2011 See Catalog Combatants and noncombatants (International law) THE IMAGE BEFORE THE WEAPON: A CRITICAL HISTORY OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN COMBATANT AND CIVILIAN / HELEN M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Paul, Min.: West, c2011 KF3783 .N65 2011 See Catalog Collective liability (International law) ACCOUNTABILITY FOR COLLECTIVE WRONG DOING / EDITED BYTRACY ISAACS, RICHARD VERNON Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011 KZ7075 .A923 2011 See Catalog Combatants and noncombatants (International law) THE IMAGE BEFORE THE WEAPON: A CRITICAL HISTORY OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN COMBATANT AND CIVILIAN / HELEN M. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
, 21 MARQUETTE SPORTS LAW REVIEW 293 (2010)Richard T. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
The Index on Censorship blog has a piece by Richard Wilson about the case of McLaughlin v LB Lambeth (see our case comment on an interlocutory decision last year)  asking the question: why would a London primary school employ the services of a political lobbying firm — and libel lawyers Carter Ruck? [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:57 pm by Jaya Ramji-Nogales
No one knows what the Supreme Court will do in Turner v. [read post]