Search for: "Richards v. United States of America"
Results 141 - 160
of 814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
If we could put the whole American body politic behind such a veil and ask them to create a new mechanism for the selection of a president, would they not be driven to adopt the mode of election that most readers of this symposium likely prefer: a national popular vote, to be conducted in a single constituency (let’s call it the collective United States of America, as opposed to fifty electorally autonomous states and the District of Columbia), with a… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am
He had learned that many demographers thought whites would eventually become a minority race in the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
United States, the next year’s United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:38 am
United States, 236 U.S. 79, a 1915 U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
Scott Anderson, Suzanne Maloney, Natan Sachs and Hady Amr spoke about the meaning of the deal for the domestic political environments of Israel, Iran and the United States, its potential impact on the Palestinians and how the agreement could change regional dynamics more broadly: Daniel Byman discussed how a new administration could more effectively combat rising white supremacist violence in the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
Only in America! [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 7:29 am
Arrests, stops and contacts carve up the universe of police-civilian interactions in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
Dodd and Richard Shelby working on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm
As Barnett explains: Spooner supplemented this interpretive claim about original public meaning with a principle of construction he took from the 1805 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
The “Leaders in Law” monthly webinar series will feature interviews with notable attorneys who are advancing civil rights in the United States and across the world. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
On June 1, President Trump spoke to governors and the public about deploying the military within the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
A survey released in 2017, on the 50th anniversary of Loving, found that one in six new marriages in the United States crosses racial or ethnic lines, although the white-black line is crossed less frequently than other lines, such as white-Asian, white-Latinx, or other combinations. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:08 pm
Timm, both United States Supreme Court cases. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am
Jackson, in his famous Veto of the bill renewing the charter of the Bank of the United States declared first that “Mere precedent is a dangerous source of authority…. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Should the rules of constitutional amendment in Article V be interpreted strictly, even if this legalistic interpretation holds back the realization of equality embedded in the formative texts of the United States, including the Declaration of Independence, the Reconstruction Dismerberments, and the many franchise-expanding constitutional changes since then? [read post]
