Search for: "Ridings v. Ridings" Results 141 - 160 of 4,749
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2010, 10:06 am by Paul Levy
  Although the so-called hot-news doctrine has been acknowledged in strong dicta in a number of Second Circuit cases, most notably NBA v Motorola in 1997, that court has not issued a holding in the modern era on whether the Supreme Court’s World War I era ruling in International News Service v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
  Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Nor do plaintiffs concerns with respect to  his bankruptcy proceeding provide a reasonable excuse for that failure (see Pipinias v J. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 6:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
What does emerge from the Aslam decision is that Uber will not have an easy ride if it claims independent contractor status in Canada either, at least under our current employment laws. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
# # ## # #DECISIONC. v County of Westchester [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:15 am by Workplace Prof
Much has already been written on the status of Uber/Lyft drivers as independent contractors v. employees. [read post]