Search for: "Rising v. USA"
Results 141 - 160
of 653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
Cinemark USA, Inc., 5550-CV-2017 (C.P. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am
Defendants are Delaware LLCs with a principal place of business in Connecticut, which is where Scheinman worked for them and ommitted the alleged malpractice (see Oxbow Calcining USA Inc. v Am. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
The lawyer’s right to make a living cannot trump the rights of ordinary people to access justice Here is the Canadian Lawyer survey, (referred to by Jennifer Leitch) showing rising legal fees and profitability of family law: https://t.co/V9nvz6Ipzo? [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
TechRadar has a piece on the rise of the Internet of Things. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:59 am
The NHS Confederation's report states on page 9 that:"The USA objectives seek provisions on protection of intellectual property rights that reflect current USA legal standards, which are generally more favourable to rights holders than EU standards. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 3:15 am
https://t.co/8zRDXpc4o8 2019-11-15 Person convicted in UK by communicating using hyperlink, Crookes v Newton interpreted, Chabloz v Crown Prosecution… https://t.co/qXGhfQT8rZ 2019-11-16 [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:57 am
(Citing Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:36 am
The investigation found many prosecutors and police are failing to comply with a landmark 1963 ruling in the case of Brady v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:36 am
The investigation found many prosecutors and police are failing to comply with a landmark 1963 ruling in the case of Brady v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 7:42 am
” Dean Potter LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm
Katz in a widely read blog entitled Access Copyright v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm
As an example, she referred to the English case of Marinos v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 11:13 pm
In Hendrickson USA, LLC. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
Our conversations about law must shift from a paternalistic subordination of the individual to an assertion of enforceable rights as intrinsic to human dignity” (Hon’ble Supreme Court of India – Jagdish v Mohan& Others- Civil appeal no. 2217 of 2018) * * * * * * * * * * * Liability insurance has become a much talked about subject and is receiving well-deserved attention of the people both on the supply and demand side in India and also worldwide. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:26 am
In Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41, Kitchin J (as he then was), set out six conditions that must be satisfied for there to be an infringement:(i) there must be use of a sign by a third party within the relevant territory;(ii) the use must be in the course of trade;(iii) it must be without the consent of the proprietor;(iv) it must be of a sign which is identical with or similar to the trade mark;(v) it must be in relation to goods… [read post]
