Search for: "Rock v. Marks" Results 141 - 160 of 745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2019, 4:41 am by SHG
He could sue the gangbanger, Cornell Caldwell, who shot him, but that’s hardly a worthwhile cause as you can’t get blood from a rock. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm by Erica Vaccarello
The overall rationale for the decision was that “speech may not be banned on the grounds that it expresses ideas that offend”, as remarked by Justice Samuel Alito (the mark was THE SLANTS, an Asian American dance rock band). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Malpractice and Tort Law Marc Ginsberg, The John Marshall Law School (Chicago), Cross-Disciplinary Expert Testimony In Medical Negligence Litigation Mark Hall, Wake Forest University, The Restatement (Third) of Medical Liability Michelle Mello, Stanford University, Practice Changes Among Medical Malpractice "Frequent Flyers" Alix Rogers, Stanford Law School, Neither Property Nor Tort: The Curious Case of Quasi-Property of Human Bodily Remains D. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Tempnology, LLC and one of the most important issues between trade mark law and bankruptcy law: whether a debtor-licensor's rejection of a trade mark licence terminates the right of the licensee to use the trade mark. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am by Brianne Gorod
” These constitutional attacks on Auer miss the mark for many reasons. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:14 am
" In this regard, the Board pointed to four oft-cited cases: In re Covalinski, In re White Rock Distilleries, Inc., Parfums de Coeur Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
SUISSE" Confusable with the SWISS Certification Mark, Both for Watches? [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:32 pm by Amy Howe
Addressing President Donald Trump’s promise to appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 12:01 am by Joanna L. Grossman
Courts began to recognize in the late 1970s that sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination, a proposition the Supreme Court agreed with in its 1986 ruling in Meritor v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(Yet another rock star Stanford fellow, with training in law and philosophy and interests in IP, health law, and corporations. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” At In These Times, James Gray Pope and others look at approaches to “rebuilding labor after the Supreme Court’s … ruling” in Janus v. [read post]