Search for: "Rodgers v State"
Results 141 - 160
of 336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Katzburg comported with the protections the United States Supreme Court mandated in Turner v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
United States, and Morgan v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The trial court agreed and declared the regulation invalid, primarily on the ground that the Board of Health exceeded its authority and violated the separation of powers doctrine as set out by the New York Court of Appeals in Boreali v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:27 pm
In representing a purchaser, developer or a developer/builder involved in a warranty dispute pertaining to a residence in the State of Florida, consider the Florida Supreme Court's most recent ruling concerning the scope and application of common law implied warranties in Maronda Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:58 am
Rodgers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011), the United States Supreme Court found South Carolina’s methods for support enforcement violated due process. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:03 am
In US v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 6:57 pm
Practices Assocs. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm
” Subsequently, in fact, the Court adopted this broader view eight years later in Moore v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
(Roberts invoked standing in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Rodgers, 133 S.Ct. at 1451. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:29 am
Two years after the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Rodgers, 12-382, back for its sixth relist. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Ultimately, however, the United States Department of Justice indicted MacDonald, and a jury convicted him after a trial in 1979. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
Rodgers, 12-382 (state-on-top), Burt v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Rodgers, 12-382, concerns the “clearly established” standard in Section 2254(d), asking whether Faretta v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
