Search for: "Rogers v. Superior Court" Results 141 - 160 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2014, 6:04 am by admin
(Misleading Advertising and Performance Claims) On August 19, 2013, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued its decision in the Chatr advertising case (Canada (Competition Bureau) v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 6:05 pm by Robert Kreisman
Johnson & Johnson (DePuy), Superior Court of San Francisco County, Calif. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm by admin
August 20, 2013 Earlier today the Competition Bureau announced the fairly long-awaited decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (per Marrocco J.) in the Rogers Chatr misleading advertising and performance claims case (Canada (Competition Bureau) v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:44 pm by admin
Earlier today the Competition Bureau announced the fairly long-awaited decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (per Marrocco J.) in the Rogers Chatr misleading advertising and performance claims case (Canada (Competition Bureau) v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  In fact, when the Court first recognized the presence of a hostile work environment as a basis for a viable theory of discrimination, it described the development of hostile work environment theory in a Fifth Circuit case, Rogers v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:00 am by Administrator
According to a recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the answer is yes. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 4:04 pm by admin
National Energy Corp., where the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that National Energy had contravened the Trade-Marks Act (subsections 7(a), 22 and 53.2) and  criminal misleading advertising provision of the Competition Act (section 52) in comparative advertising to its competitor Direct Energy. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:05 am
In Getchell v Rogers Jewelry, the plaintiff was a jewelry repairman who worked as an independent contractor at the defendant jewelry store in Arden Fair Mall. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:24 pm by admin
Time case, and the ongoing Rogers case, which has again raised the issues of disclaimers, the appropriate data for performance claims and what type of consumer is relevant for the “general impression” test under the Competition Act (i.e., an “average consumer” or the rather lower standard held by the Supreme Court recently in Richard v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:22 pm by Michael Schmidt
Rogers in the Superior Court of New Jersey, which involved an employee accidentally bumping a co-worker's computer and gaining access to the co-worker's e-mails. [read post]