Search for: "Rome v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2021, 1:07 am
In line with the above-stated quotation, they suggest a radical reorientation of choice-of-law rules. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:40 am
Jensen: The Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement: A Comparative Analysis of the United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in Enka v Chubb On 9 October 2020 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom rendered its much-anticipated decision in Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi A.S. v OOO Insurance Company Chubb (Enka v Chubb). [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
Otherwise, they would be facing administrative or criminal proceedings under the laws of each Member State. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 7:13 am
The article proceeds with an analysis of the applicability of the Rome I Convention, finding that Rome I applies to the contractual liability of an arbitrator. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am
Scope: applies to all Berne works, not just literary works, though optional for related rights b/c Rome Convention has no mandatory quotation right. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:37 am
In the recent case of Owen v Galgey & Ors.,[2] the English High Court was faced with the issue of applying Article 4 of Rome II to a personal injury case. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am
He has kindly provided us with his thoughts on recent proposals for amending the Rome II Regulation. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:01 pm
McLean & V. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
The UK has wisely carried forward the rules of applicable law contained in the Rome Regulations. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Sanford, Plessy v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm
Supreme Court decision holding that plaintiffs suing a foreign government under the statutory exception for state-sponsored terrorism can seek punitive damages for terrorism. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm
Supreme Court decision holding that plaintiffs suing a foreign government under the statutory exception for state-sponsored terrorism can seek punitive damages for terrorism. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 6:38 am
ItalyFacebook v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:53 pm
The Prosecutor reached this decision on admissibility grounds under Article 17 of the Rome Statute. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
The majority (for the benefit of non-UK readers, when there is a majority the law is to be understood to be stated on this matter by that majority in a manner as authoritative as if there had been unanimity across all five judges) considered that there was no choice of an applicable law pertinent to Art.3 of Rome I in the underlying contract by which Enka’s services had been engaged. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
The bottom line: The Commissioner held that Education Law §310 provides no basis to review an alleged act or omission by the DCCE or by the BOR or its members. * Deaccession is the official removing of an item from a public library, museum, or art gallery in order to sell it or otherwise dispose of it. ** See Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Rome v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
The bottom line: The Commissioner held that Education Law §310 provides no basis to review an alleged act or omission by the DCCE or by the BOR or its members. * Deaccession is the official removing of an item from a public library, museum, or art gallery in order to sell it or otherwise dispose of it. ** See Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Rome v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court heard arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
Jahrhunderts v. [read post]
