Search for: "Royce v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 11:58 am by Richard Renner
United States Dep’t of Labor, 134 F.3d 1292, 1295 (6th Cir. 1998). [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
 ADDENDUM: On December 17, 2007, United States District Judge Royce Lamberth (D.D.C.) issued an order finding that Secret Service White House visitor logs are agency records subject to the FOIA, rather than documents protected by so-called presidential privilege. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am by INFORRM
Media and Freedom of Expression Law in Other Jurisdictions The Tasmanian case of Burch v Parkinson ([2010] TASSC 42) concerned third party indemnity proceedings against the State of Tasmania. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:46 am by Benjamin Wittes
Slahi presents no threat to the United States or any other country, and his continued detention is unjustified. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
  The practice of making these supplemental data requests was upheld in a November 2011 ruling by Royce Lamberth, Chief Judge of the federal district court in D.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:28 pm
Washington, DC, District Chief Judge Royce Lamberth made the ruling (.pdf) in the case known as Horn v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Maryland Court of Appeals reached a decision in University of Maryland Medical System v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The Maryland Court of Appeals reached a decision in University of Maryland Medical System v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Chief Judge Royce Lamberth of the same court also found the detention center’s counsel access procedures to be invalid. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:00 am by Ed Stein
And as the Supreme Court held the 1983 case Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:32 am by Charlie Dunlap
But I would have also thought the same of criminalizing the teaching of law as “material support,” but the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]