Search for: "Runge v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm by Orin S. Kerr
All of this is a wind-up to say that, last week, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled on both questions in considerable detail in an important new case, State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am by Rita Zhao
The advantage of this is that it gives the patent owner protection throughout the member states of the Gulf Co-operation Council i.e., Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am by Diane Tweedlie
Admissibility of opponent/respondent II's intervention1.1 The present intervention of respondent II was filed pursuant to Article 105(1)(a) EPC, which states the following (emphasis added by the Board):"(1) Any third party may, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations, intervene in opposition proceedings after the opposition period has expired, if the third party proves that(a) proceedings for infringement of the same patent have been instituted against him, or... [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am by Diane Tweedlie
Admissibility of opponent/respondent II's intervention1.1 The present intervention of respondent II was filed pursuant to Article 105(1)(a) EPC, which states the following (emphasis added by the Board):"(1) Any third party may, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations, intervene in opposition proceedings after the opposition period has expired, if the third party proves that(a) proceedings for infringement of the same patent have been instituted against him, or... [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:35 pm by Matthias Weller
Internationales Privat- und Verfahrensrecht sowie Völkerrecht Moritz BRINKMANN und Thomas VOGT GEISSE Qualifikation und Anknüpfung von Instrumenten der prozessvorbereitenden Aufklärung Eckart BRÖDERMANN Vom Drachen-steigen-Lassen – Ein internationales Jura-Märchen zum IPR/IZVR Hannah L. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
But the thing that really rung Ring Plus's bell was finding inequitable conduct. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm by Ilya Somin
Second, immigrants and their descendants have been essential in reducing the scope of affirmative action in the United States over the last 30 years…. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 pm by Nathan
So someone on the bottom rung of a drug sale could easily wind up getting the kingpin sentence. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“And, although the idea of post-market review of deceptive claims may be appealing to the tobacco industry, the government has made a reasonable determination that, in the context of a deadly and highly addictive product, it would be a virtual impossibility to unring the bell of misinformation after it has been rung. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm by Lev Sugarman
Glaser, former Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes, and Sarah Runge, former Director of the Office of Strategic Policy, Terrorist Financing and Financial Crimes. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm by Josh Blackman
[After two days of hero worship for Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Gorsuch, day three dumps on the Junior Justice.] [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm by Shannon Sims
The course will also provide those who intend to practice Climate Change Law & Policy in the United States a better understanding of the rationales for the international, national and state mechanisms adopted to face this major problem.Methodology. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Under German insolvency law, the debtor does not lose its legal capacity even if it loses the power to administer and dispose of the insolvency estate (see Schulte, Patentgesetz mit EPÜ, 10th edition, Introduction, paragraph 217).3.3 For the reasons stated above, the board had no reason to interrupt t [read post]