Search for: "Russian v. English" Results 141 - 160 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2011, 5:23 am by INFORRM
The first defendant The Russian Television & Radio Broadcasting Company is based in Russia. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
He asserted that Petrushova and her husband were working for Mukhtar Ablyazov, a Kazakh national who has been found by an English court to have defrauded a Kazakh bank of $4.6 billion. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The NT2 case was the first “delisting order” made by an English court and was, perhaps understandably, the focus of most of the media reporting (for example, the BBC and the Guardian). [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 7:25 am
But it is not just Prescott who has the ability to use the English language in unusual ways. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 6:15 am by Astrid Reisinger Coracini
Non-states parties, including the Russian Federation, participated in these negotiations. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
This is consistent with the award of £110,000 libel damages earlier in July 2015 to the Russian businessman Vladimir Sloutsker in his claim against a Russian journalist who alleged in an online blog that Sloutsker had taken out a contract to kill her husband. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 11:20 pm
Cir. 2005), in maintaining that mark is arbitrary because the term would not be translated into English by the ordinary (i.e., non-Russian speaking) American consumer, and that "its geographic meaning would be lost on the public. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
The claim related to allegations about the relationship between Mr Banks and the Russian government in relation to the acceptance of foreign funding, which were found to convey a meaning that Mr Banks had been dishonest about the nature of this relationship. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Ritika Singh
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
The practical implication of this decision was that McGahn would have to appear before the House Judiciary Committee as part of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, despite Trump’s insistence to the contrary. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:10 am by Amy Howe
” When the justices hear oral argument next week in Animal Science Products v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:42 am by Dan Harris
Their work has taken on new significance since February, when President Vladimir V. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:29 pm by Scott R. Anderson
The Supreme Court affirmed as much in its 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]