Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 141 - 160
of 62,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2009, 2:09 am
Birmingham City Council v Ali and others; Moran v Manchester City Council (Women's Aid Federation of England and another intervening) [2009] UKHL 36; [2009] WLR (D) 221 “Although it had not been reasonable for families to remain in their current accommodation indefinitely, the local housing authority had been entitled to leave them there in the short [...] [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
My guess is that the Court’s December 2023 opinion in State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:02 pm
La notion de "includes", "including" n'est pas limitative, de sorte que la loi peut s'appliquer à d'autres situations encore. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:24 am
Defazio, 2007 WL 496813 (D. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 9:17 pm
D. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:23 am
R v Ahmed; [2010] WLR (D) 219 “The act of procuring the miscarriage of a woman’s child did not, by itself, amount to an offence known to English law. [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:38 am
R v Bassett; [2008] WLR (D) 157 “For an offence of voyeurism to be committed, within the definition in s 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, there had to be a private act which involved parts of the body for which people would normally expect privacy, as defined by s 68(1). [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:33 am
Essex Trading Standards v Singh; [2009] WLR (D) 81 “In order to acquit a defendant of a charge of unauthorised use of registered trade marks in relation to goods, contrary to s 92(1)(c) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, under the statutory defence provided by s 92(5) of the Act, it was not enough for the [...] [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
Benedict v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
Watkins v Woolas [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB); [2010] WLR (D) 288 “S 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, which imposed the penalties for an election candidate found guilty of a corrupt or illegal practice, was compatible with the right to freedom of expression contained in art 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:25 am
Regina v Newell [2012] EWCA Crim 650; [2012] WLR (D) 105 “A statement made on a plea and case management hearing form by the defendant’s counsel, although admissible in principle as a matter of law, should not, in the exercise of the court’s discretion under section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (‘PACE’), be admitted in evidence against the defendant at trial, provided that the case had been conducted in accordance… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:46 am
Michel v The Queen [2009] UKPC 40; [2009] WLR (D) 312 “A defendant's right to a fair trial was absolute and he was entitled to explain his case, however improbable, without constantly being subjected to the judge's sarcasm and hostility. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
Posted by D. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 11:45 am
Wright, George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty ask What’s Next in Apple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:08 am
Nguyen, Faculty of Law, Lund University addresses Competition Rules in the TRIPS Agreement: The CFI's Ruling in Microsoft v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Daniel Sokol Ruchit Patel, Cleary Gottlieb explains English Court of Appeal’s Judgment in Cooper Tire and Ors v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:08 am
Nguyen, Faculty of Law, Lund University addresses Competition Rules in the TRIPS Agreement: The CFI's Ruling in Microsoft v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:01 am
Ce billet cherche à mettre à jour — sans le réécrire en entier — celui que j'ai publié en juillet 2017 : Affelnet : le logiciel d'affectation dans les lycées à Paris bugue sévèrement pour la deuxième année consécutive. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 7:11 am
National Union, the Delaware Superior Court explained that Stillwater had seized upon the Court’s 2019 opinion in Solera Holdings v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
R (Baiai and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Nos 1 and 2); R (Bigoku and another) v Same; R (Tilki) v Same (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 53; [2008] WLR (D) 272 “The statutory scheme requiring the Secretary of State's permission for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed the right to marry… [read post]
