Search for: "S.C.R."
Results 141 - 160
of 897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2009, 4:37 am
Barrette [2008] 3 S.C.R. 392 State of Connecticut, Power Inc., et al. [read post]
7 May 2008, 8:39 am
Hughes, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 880), it is extremely important that the non-tangible elements of the situation â€â [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Wray , [1971] S.C.R. 272). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:59 pm
Korn, [1995] 3 S.C.R. 674 at paras. 40-49. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
., [2002] 1 S.C.R. 595, 2002 SCC 18]. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:28 am
Canada, Supreme Court of Canada [2005] 2 S.C.R. 91, 2005 SCC 39 I will be blogging from the conference, focusing on the legal aspects of this complex issue. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688: (a) the unique systemic or background factors which may have played a part in bringing the particular Aboriginal offender before the courts; and (b) the types of sentencing procedures and sanctions which may be appropriate in the circumstances for the offender because of his or her particular Aboriginal heritage or connection. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 pm
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:15 am
Zastowny, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 27, (2008) S.C.C. 4, wherein the Supreme Court of Canada, on appeal from this court, affirmed the appropriateness of a deduction in damages to take account of a period of incarceration that was established as a fact at the trial. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:14 am
Victoria (City) ([1999] 1 S.C.R. 201 – link to this case athttp://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1999/1999canlii706/1999canlii706.html ) The plaintiff was awarded $71,589 plus prejudgment interest (from June 2004 to December 2009) and post-judgment interest thereafter. by Jackie Campbell ©2010 Environmental Law and Litigation. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:56 pm
McDougall, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 41, there is only one standard of proof in civil cases: the balance of probabilities. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:36 am
Sam is an American trained lawyer and has expertise in both Canadian and American copyright law.Sam suggests that:The Act's fair dealing provisions should be amended to correspond with the values stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in CCH v Law Society of Upper Canada [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:56 am
British Columbia (Securities Commission), 2000 SCC 21, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 494 Here is the Bill, a backgrounder on the reference, a press release, and more background on how the scheme would work, with provincial opt-ins. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
., [1958] S.C.R. 392, was such a case.63 In Bennett, the deceased's letter to her lawy [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
Leonati, 1996 CanLII 183 (SCC), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458 at para. 14, Walker Estate v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
Mohan, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9 5. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458). [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
., [1929] S.C.R. 117, Bater v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:26 am
Miglin, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 303. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
Canadian Ass’n of Internet Providers, 2004 SCC 45 (CanLII), [2004] 2 S.C.R. 427 at paragraph 59. [read post]
